The People Vs Larry Flynt Essay Research free essay sample

The People Vs Larry Flynt Essay, Research Paper The People vs. Larry Flynt After watching the film The people vs. Larrry Flynt, and detecting his characters suggestion that, society should be more concerned with the ordinance s of the word picture of force alternatively of concentrating on lewdness. # 8220 ; If the First Amendment will protect a scumbag like me, so it will protect all of you. Because I # 8217 ; m the worst. # 8221 ; Under this blazon The People vs. Larry Flynt progresss. Flynt is the publishing house of Hustler whose calling in the porno-mag concern and whose tangled by the people sentiments and statement about his magazine. I found that there is a point to his statement. This paper will build a treatment based upon the statement by Larry Flynt s character. And expression at Obscenity and Violence in society. The statement was a direct relation to the Freedom of address statement put frontward by many people. We will write a custom essay sample on The People Vs Larry Flynt Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The film The People vs. Larry Flynt is slightly simular to the film South Park: Bigger: Longer and Uncut is the same facet that it is seeking to turn out a point. Although it seemed to me that it was making this in a more amusing manner, opposed the The People vs. Larry Flynt. The name of the film itself explains the fact that people ( mentioning to the people that didn t read the magazine ) were against Larry Flynts magazine Hustler yet his dream ( holding the best adult magazine ) was seen appropriate by himself as he one time said the human organic structure is a beautiful thing and is similar nature why non be aloud to demo it off. Obscenity is such a comparative term. The complexness of our society today, and the diverseness of beliefs that exist, demands that we non judge based upon norms because it is impossible to make such a criterion. What must be realized is that people will hold changing beliefs covering non merely with lewdness but besides with every issue present today. Merely by leting uninhibited personal freedom can it work to make an environment that does non except certain beliefs because the # 8220 ; bulk # 8221 ; doesn # 8217 ; t excuse them. The illegal actions of certain persons ( i.e. pack colza, slaying etc. ) apparently inspired by magazines such as Hustler are merely anomalies concurrent with the general decay of society. Obscenity is really much in the oculus of the perceiver. There are many things people would instead non hold to look at. Freedom of Speech already has bounds ( e.g. Shouting # 8220 ; FIRE # 8221 ; in a theater, or Slander, Verbal assault ) . Unlimited freedom of address means that the Newspapers could publish whatever ( even though they seem to make this already about ) it wanted to, without worrying about the truth. As it stands, protected address is limited to sentiments, point of views, and the truth. A bare adult female ( or adult male ) is non in itself obscene but camera angles which simulate a point of view of a adult female which merely a Gynecologist has seen likely isn # 8217 ; t depicting ( to me anyhow ) the beauty and natural flow of the human organic structure and beloved non to be art. The bounds on freedom of address apply to public address. Private address is limitless free address. I have put together some point of view that I came across in my research and found that they had a batch to state. My point of view is this. If you think it is obscene so that is because you don # 8217 ; t believe in it and your belief is merely sentiment. To the people that think this is obscene I have upseting intelligence. You people evidently neer seen the darkest corners and back streets of life if you had you would happen that they are so much more distressing so the streetwalker magazine. To the people I have this to state. A bare image does non do you make drugs and does non do you kill a adult male. Here is the bottom line what one does non cognize one is scared of and what one is scared of one attempt # 8217 ; s to destruct. Can you conceive of if the whole universe was scared midst about it. I believe in Larry Flynt and life in this great free state and after all we the people are the 1s who make it free ( Joesph, 1997 ) . It is astonishing to me that people, T ime and clip once more bury their yesteryear. There are and at that place have ever been people who, for their beliefs entirely, have attempted to specify what is obscene. Even William Shakespeare in his clip was ridiculed and censored for the contents of his work, The Taming of the Shrew, for case. ( And I am non stating that Hustler is comparative to Will’s dramas ) I don’t believe that anything in the amusement industry is truly obscene. War is obscene, a state that allows its citizens to decease due to the deficiency of low-cost health care is obscene, and leting people to be homeless is obscene. Turning your dorsum on anyone who needs your aid is obscene. If this state and our authorities put as much clip and lip service into work outing these jobs alternatively of seeking to moralise America, so our kids would turn up decent. My boy isn’t traveling to retrieve a bare image of a lady every bit much as he is traveling to retrieve the sight of a handicapped ad ult male kiping in a room access and excavation through the refuse for nutrient. And for the good Christian in his campaign against the wickednesss of the flesh, wouldn’t your clip be better exhausted volunteering in your community? Which one do you believe God would detect more? ( Michelle, 1997 ) . Those point of views are instead interesting as they hold agencies to the statement the Larry Flynt made. When person must travel out of their manner to acquire the magazine, it is easier to support the freedom of that less public address. Kids will still acquire their custodies on it, but that will non be Hustler # 8217 ; s mistake. I don # 8217 ; t think that Hustler belongs following to Nintendo magazine, but Hustler decidedly has a right to publish what it wants, every bit long as the lone people who see it are people non offended by it. Violence is one of those endemic societal jobs that have plagued society since its earliest beginnings. It genuinely displays the savageness that we, as a people, are capable of. It illustrates both the confusion and choler of the laden and ignored within our society and the brutal savageness which the privileged and powerful are capable of. Violence is frequently the voice of those who would hold no voice. Violence is a tool of the weak and neglected, those who can non exercise control in any other manner. While our society prides itself on stand foring all people it handily omits a overplus of phrases that should follow. It represents all people # 8230 ; that have money. It represents all people # 8230 ; that have power. It represents all people # 8230 ; that have influence. So long as you can afford it, non-violence is the best path to work outing our jobs, but tell that to the hapless drug nuts of the interior metropolis. State that to the vilified idealistic groups who are ignored and have no voice. State that to the laden minority who is non regarded or treated as a human being. Violence is the tool of ignorance and so long as society forcibly decline to educate our people they will see force as the lone reply to their jobs. In decision the contiversal statement by Larry Flynt that society should be more concerned about modulating the word picture of force alternatively of concentrating on lewdness. This is an unreciprocated inquiry that society attempt s to cover will one of the jobs more greatly so the other and hence looked as picking on that peculiar Wrights, or freedom. The statement stands that the human organic structure is a beautiful thing and is one with nature, for this ground is should be viewed and shown freely to the universe. Yet in the same regard it besides should non be exploited in anyhow. And I believe that the people that opposed Larry Flynt sore this to be true as the adult females that were exposures for his magazine were in exploited place, non in at that place natural province or beauty. Bibliography hypertext transfer protocol: //www.spe.sony.com/movies/larryflyn.boardobscence.html hypertext transfer protocol: //www.home.earthlink.net/lana/violence.html hypertext transfer protocol: //www.theneurepublic.com/magazine/tnr/teonly.012097/txt guffmain017097.html The People vs. Larry Flynt 33a

Free Essays on Niebuhr Vs Augustine

Reading the selection by Reinhold Niebuhr on his thoughts of Augustine’s theories was an interesting comparison to the other works we have recently read. His views were similar to some, but almost opposite of others. Although Niebuhr and John Howard Yoder are not necessarily representative of opposing "schools" in Christian social ethics, they do emphasize opposing themes that have been hot topics in the Christian world in the past century. Niebuhr states that he does not believe that pacifism would actually work in society. He separates idealism away from his main point of view- what we know as Christian Realism. One of the greatest things Niebuhr accomplished was bringing Augustinian thought back into public eye. Augustine’s ideas had fallen out of fashion among modern Christians. Niebuhr modernized his ideas and brought them back into current discussion. Niebuhr’s Christian Realism is based on Augustine’s understanding of human nature. Recognizing that humans have the innate will to survive, he knows that we will do whatever it takes to prolong our lives. This is the root of selfish desire, or original sin, as Augustine preached. We try to achieve self worth by getting more power, prestige, pleasure, or wealth. Sometimes we do it in a constructive way, other times in a harmful way. Niebuhr explains that once we start seeking out these things, rivalry between people begins. We would rather fight than compromise if there were a logical chance of gaining something. But Niebuhr says that fighting is irrational. Humans need each other in order to survive. He pre aches that we need to work together for the benefit of all, but occasional uprisings are unavoidable. Because of this, Niebuhr reasons (in an Augustinian way) that a social hierarchy is needed. Both theologians recognize the need for order. Yoder and Niebuhr differ greatly in their opinions on religion. Yoder is a definite pacifist, whereas Niebuhr s... Free Essays on Niebuhr Vs Augustine Free Essays on Niebuhr Vs Augustine Reading the selection by Reinhold Niebuhr on his thoughts of Augustine’s theories was an interesting comparison to the other works we have recently read. His views were similar to some, but almost opposite of others. Although Niebuhr and John Howard Yoder are not necessarily representative of opposing "schools" in Christian social ethics, they do emphasize opposing themes that have been hot topics in the Christian world in the past century. Niebuhr states that he does not believe that pacifism would actually work in society. He separates idealism away from his main point of view- what we know as Christian Realism. One of the greatest things Niebuhr accomplished was bringing Augustinian thought back into public eye. Augustine’s ideas had fallen out of fashion among modern Christians. Niebuhr modernized his ideas and brought them back into current discussion. Niebuhr’s Christian Realism is based on Augustine’s understanding of human nature. Recognizing that humans have the innate will to survive, he knows that we will do whatever it takes to prolong our lives. This is the root of selfish desire, or original sin, as Augustine preached. We try to achieve self worth by getting more power, prestige, pleasure, or wealth. Sometimes we do it in a constructive way, other times in a harmful way. Niebuhr explains that once we start seeking out these things, rivalry between people begins. We would rather fight than compromise if there were a logical chance of gaining something. But Niebuhr says that fighting is irrational. Humans need each other in order to survive. He pre aches that we need to work together for the benefit of all, but occasional uprisings are unavoidable. Because of this, Niebuhr reasons (in an Augustinian way) that a social hierarchy is needed. Both theologians recognize the need for order. Yoder and Niebuhr differ greatly in their opinions on religion. Yoder is a definite pacifist, whereas Niebuhr s...

Idioms and Expressions in English Using Work

Idioms and Expressions in English Using Work The following idioms and expressions use the noun / verb work. Each idiom or expression has a definition and two example sentences to help your  understanding of these common idiomatic expressions with work. English Idioms and Expressions All in a days work Definition: nothing special, part of the routine Dont worry about it. Its all in a days work.Cooking is all in a days work. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. Definition: Idiom meaning that you need to have fun in order to be a happy, healthy person Go home! Remember: All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.Im worried about him. He hasnt yet understood that all work and no play makes jack a dull boy. Dirty work Definition: Necessary, but uninteresting, or difficult work He did the dirty work on that project.Have you got around to doing the dirty work yet? Get down to work Definition: Stop relaxing, focus on important task Hey, lets get down to work here!Sorry, Ive got to get off the phone and get down to work. Get worked up over something Definition: become angry or annoyed about something He got all worked up over the last exam.Dont get worked up over the garden. Ill take care of it tomorrow. Make short work of something Definition: do something quickly I made short work of the assignment and moved on to the next job.Give it to John. Hell make short work of it. Work like a horse Definition: work a lot, work very hard Janet works like a horse!Why dont you ask Tom. He works like a horse. Work out for the best Definition: eventually finish well Dont worry about your problems. Everything will work out for the best.The divorce worked out for the best for the whole family. Work something off Definition: lose weight Im going running to work dinner off.She went to the gym to work off a few pounds. Throw a monkey wrench in the works Definition: cause a disturbance in something that seems clear and understandable I hate to throw a monkey wrench in the works, but dont you think we should ask Andy to help.Everything was set to go when Jack threw a monkey wrench in the works!

Aircraft landing gear system Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Aircraft landing gear system - Essay Example twisted, shielded pair with shield grounded at both ends Source (transmitter) must be able to handle 400 ? at the maximum. Receivers must have minimum effective input impedance of 8 ? Normally designed for range of less than 175 ft (or 50+ meters) A data â€Å"one† is created when the rising edge goes from 0 to 10+/- 1 positive volts; a data â€Å"zero† is created when the falling edge goes down from 0 to 10+/- 1 negative volts Error Checking ARINC 429 uses the odd parity bit to detect error and ensure that data that is being received is accurate. It is the last bit in a message transmission constantly changing with label and data change always resulting in â€Å"Odd Parity† always containing the number ‘1.’ Data Word Format An ARINC message is usually a single data word that is 32-bit long and includes five fields: Label; SDI; Data; SSM, and; Parity. Label identifies the kind of data that being transmitted and has a value of 8. SDI (or Source Destin ation Identifier), specifies the value of the intended receiver. In a system with multiple receivers, each receiver is assigned a value. Data, the actual message of the transmission, uses two kinds of format: the BCD (short for Binary Coded Decimal), uses four bits, and; the BNR (short for Binary encoding). Both define units, resolution, range, number of bits used and frequency of the label. SSM (or Status/Sign Matrix) assists in the interpretation of numeric values in the data field with values such as ‘north,’ ‘east,’ ‘plus,’ ‘minus,’ etc. Finally, P, for parity bit, is the last bit transmitted (Cook et al 462). c) Comparison of ARINC 429, ARINC 629 and MIL 1553B Databuses 1. Encoding Method ARINC 429 uses a bipolar return to 0 type of encoding; MIL 1553B uses the Manchester II biphase where a logic one (1) is transmitted as a bipolar coded signal I/O and a logic zero (0) as a bipolar coded signal I/O (TSCM 9-6.2). ARINC 629 also uses binary encoding. 2. Bus Coupling Method The ARINC 429 has integrated line transmitter/receivers that software can program to receive (Rx) or transmit (Tx) and operate at specific transmission rate independently of other channels. On the other hand, ARINC 629 incorporates bus controllers into every unit and coupling is made using current transformers without cutting off wires. Meanwhile, MIL 1553B uses the transformer and direct method of bus coupling. 3. Data Word Format ARINC 429 uses a 32-bit data format. Fig. 2 illustrates the allocation of bits in the fields. It also shows the numbering of bits from 1, or the LSB (Least Significant Bit), to 32, or the MSB (Most Significant Bit). In the order of transmission, the Label is transmitted first, with the MSB going out before the LSB, but in all other fields, the LSB is transmitted first. Fig. 2 shows the order of transmission by field (label, SDI, Data, SSM and P) within every field. MSB LSB Fig. 2 ARINC 429 32-bit Word Format ( AIM GmbH p. 15) Fig. 3 ARINC 429 Word Transfer Order (AIM GmbH p. 15) On the other hand, ARINC 629 uses a 20-bit date format, where the first three bits are allocated to word time synchronisation, the next 16 bits to data content and the last bit as parity bit. Fig. 4 illustrates the bit allocation in an ARINC 629 data bus system and shows that it has only three fields as opposed to the ARINC 429 that may have as

Colonial America & American Art Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Colonial America & American Art - Research Paper Example What is most striking is their approach to social, economic and political inequality, a theme that has run deep throughout American history, and continues to do so today. Zinn begins his account of American history, predictably, with the first expeditions of Columbus to the New World. Some pages later, the author gives a clear excursus on his approach to and conception of history, and his view on the role of the historian. Zinn explains that he has rejected history which involves a grand narrative of political events, of war and of conquest; in short, he has rejected the history of the nation. He quotes Kissinger’s assertion that ‘History is the memory of the State’ in order to reject it (19). Kissinger, by contrast, was most interested in a model of history based on the nation-state, and relations between nation-states. He penned several works on theories of power relations, and on the history of European state relations in the 19th century. Zinn suggests a diffe rent approach – an attempt to view history from the perspective of ‘the people’: ‘the story of the discovery of America from the viewpoint from the viewpoint of the Arawaks, of the Constitution from the standpoint of the slaves, of Andrew Jackson as seen by the Cherokees’, and so forth (10). ... This is in contrast to the more conventional view of history taken by Craven. Craven’s book is essentially a catalogue of the styles and trends in art and architecture which have developed and flourished at different stages in American history. The historical summaries given at the beginning of each major section (i.e. Colonial America, Federal America etc.) are essentially a narrative of high political developments. The historical introduction given to the Federal period is a particularly good example. Having mentioned that the newly-independent colonies were troubled by their squabbling Congress, Craven goes on to emphasize that America was ‘also the home of a large number of exceptional men – George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, and Alexander Hamilton, to mention but a few’ (110). This presentation of the ‘great men’ view of history, explored in some detail by the great 19th century historian and essayist Thomas Carlyle, could not be more different from the presentation of the so-called ‘Founding Fathers’ in Zinn’s account. In a chapter entitled ‘Tyranny is Tyranny’, in which he charts the beginnings of the American Revolution, Zinn interprets events in a framework which could easily be called Marxist (59). He sees the events leading to the War of Independence as a struggle between the working class and a landowning, wealthy class for control of political power in the nascent country. The initial skirmishes may have been the work of commoners, but, as Zinn sees it, ‘certain important people in the English colonies’ the seized control of the convulsions (59). By creating a

What is Religion Essay -- essays research papers fc

World Religion What is Religion?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  According to the American College Dictionary, religion is a noun defined as the quest for the values of the ideal life. This definition is vast and general, allowing for a variety of interpretations by people from all cultures. There is no single path to follow in order to lead an ideal life, only personal beliefs and experiences. Religion is non-finite so there is no way of determining a boundary (Smart, 5). In my quest for a true understanding of what religion is I explored my own traditions and religious beliefs as well as life experiences. Slowly, with the added insight from the text and videos, my own definition of religion has begun to take shape.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Perhaps the most powerful statement made about religion was made by Dr. John Simmons of Western Illinois University. He makes the valid point that religion is not a noun, but a verb. Religion is based on beliefs and how people act based on those beliefs. Tradition, prayer, and meditation are all acts of religion and are considered intangible behaviors. Although many rituals of religion are â€Å"things†, the ethical and social portions are lifestyles. In addition to this point, Dr. Simmons mentions the possibility of religion being founded as a way to understand and answer important questions about life and death. People must find out who they are, why they are here on Earth, and what purpose their life holds. Questions known as boundary questions are posed when humans are faced with new situations in their lives (Beliefs and Believers, Class 1). They must believe that there is reasoning to support their actions. Rites of passage are the most frequent exper iences involving boundary questions. For example, as a child of Christian parents, I was told that people die because it is their turn to be with Jesus. Heaven made sense to me and comforted me, knowing that my loved ones would be in such a wonderful place. Also in the Christian religion, questions may arise about the beginning of life and how we got to Earth. The myth of Adam and Eve and the story of the Creation answers that for Christian believers. As for my purpose on Earth, my question was answered by the Christian doctrine. I am here to spread the word of God in actions and words so that all humans may know His love. However, these answers do not make sense to a... ... identity and answers profound life questions otherwise unobtainable. In only a short period of time, my perception of religion has changed vastly. I have been introduced to many other perspectives that have impacted my own beliefs. I hope that as I continue to study new religious ideas, my understanding and knowledge will grow as well. BIBLIOGRAPHY Beliefs and Believers. Teleclass.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  University Park, Illinois: Governors State University, 1999 Marty, Martin. Interview with Dr. John K. Simmons. Beliefs and Believers:   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  University Park, Illinois: Governors State University, 1999 Simmons, Dr. John K. Beliefs and Believers Teleclass Study Guide.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt, 1999 Smart, Ninian. Worldviews: Crosscultural Explorations of Human Beliefs (Third Ed).   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000 Tindall, George. America: Brief 5th Edition.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  NY, NY: Norton, 2000 Williams, Rev. Cecil. Interview with Dr. John K. Simmons. Beliefs and Believers:   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  University Park, Illinois: Governors State University, 1999

In What Ways Does The Character Of Othello Conform to Literary Tradition Of The Tragic Hero?

Othello is one of Shakespeare's most famous tragedies entwined with death, hate and deceit. It tells the story of a well respected and admired war hero, who gradually through the play falls from grace. We are told how jealousy overcomes him so greatly that he murders his innocent lover, and how the resentful Iago seeks revenge on other characters in the play as he envies their positions of power and authority and uses lies, stealing and even murder to get revenge. Another theme explored in the play is racism. We know Othello has worked hard to overcome racial prejudices in society to reach such a point of great authority and respect, and this makes his story even more tragic because it wasn't as if all that power and status was just given to him. It was his life's work, it meant everything to him and then he lost it all. In literary tradition a tragic hero is a courageous person who has authority and power yet loses it all. The steps a tragic hero makes during his decline are entirely his own. Although influenced by another, the tragic hero always displays free will, and the decisions that lead to his demise are his own, which means that had he of been more careful his death could have been avoided. It was Othello's fault because of his lack of trust in Desdemona, which resulted in the destruction of them both. Tragic heroes do not necessarily need to die; however they do in all the plays written by Shakespeare. If they do live, then they are destined to suffer moral destruction and lose sense of what is right and wrong, blinded by their feelings and the suffering that they have experienced. It is crucial that a tragic hero possesses many good personality traits, even if he is a bad person and has evil intentions such as Macbeth, but they must all have one fatal flaw. Othello had both greatness and weakness. However Othello possessed too much greatness, and was too successful, noble and too proud and couldn't believe that he had ever been wrong. Once he lost his pride and dignity it was all over for him because he had nothing else. Othello is a successful soldier because he has overcome many dangers and is full of awe-inspiring stories of his courage, will- power, bravery and physical strength. He sounds completely dedicated to his work, and nothing seems to distract him from it as he is always completely focused on it. Every conversation he has he refers to it and we don't know that he has any other interests. Even his relationship is dominated by his work. Desdemona is captivated by his heroic stories and is full of admiration towards him; in a sense it is his status and the excitement of his amazing adventures that she has fallen in love with, not Othello himself: ‘She'd come again, and with a greedy ear Devour up my discourse.' Here Othello tells the nobles who have met to discuss battle plans, interrupted by Brabantio accusing Othello of using witchcraft to make Desdemona fall in love with him, that she started to fall in love with him when he told her the stories of the journeys he had made and the battles he had fought in. He describes her fascination with them. The word ‘greedy' suggests she was suffering from a desire to hear more and ‘devour' suggests that she was desperate to take as much of it in as possible. It could be said that the couple were always destined for sadness because they were not truly in love, just with each others' image: ‘She loved me for the dangers I and passed, And I loved her, that she did pity them' Othello is describing how he knew that she loved him for his experiences in life and courageous character, and that he loved her because she admired him so much. This is an example of how Othello is far too proud, as he loved her only because she was so full of praise for him. This makes me think that he won't be a very good husband as he is too self absorbed, and it sounds as if he is far more concerned about himself than with his wife. Maybe winning her heart was just another achievement to him. Iago is overcome with envy when Othello is sent on an urgent military mission in Cyprus and he does not receive the promotion that he was intently waiting for. Instead the position of Lieutenant is given to a young Florentine soldier Cassio. In anger Iago seeks revenge on them both for professional and personal reasons. His revenge on Othello is targeted through his relationship with his wife: he wants to make Othello feel pain and emotional upset, by convincing him that his wife is seeing Cassio behind his back and likes him above Othello, and he believes will achieve this. He knows that Othello is always used to being the one who everyone admires and looks up too and that he always gets what he wants, and always seems to win, whether in work or love. Iago wants him to feel as if there is someone better than him and that he isn't as good as he thinks he is. He plans to poison Othello against his innocent wife and frame Cassio by planting a handkerchief belonging to Desdemona in Cassio's bedchamber. Iago is fraught with jealousy as he feels that he has worked hard to achieve what he wants, putting in time and effort, yet it has been Othello who has been rewarded, through what seems like little effort and pure luck. Iago is an evil force because he is ruthlessly interfering with their relationship, something which has nothing to do with him and it isn't as if that will even make his situation any better or solve anything. It is pure revenge without any regard for their feelings. What is even worse is that during this he is acting as a friend to Othello, and it is far more painful to be struck by a friend than an enemy. Othello believes Iago is someone that he can trust and this is certainly not true. When Othello is told of Desdemona's adultery, he seems instantly convinced that it is true, which shows that he doesn't have much faith in her, or know her very well: ‘This fellows of exceeding honesty,' He seems completely decided about her immediately and believes Iago without question. We know that he does not believe Iago because of insecurity or low self-esteem, so Othello and Desdemona's relationship can never have been very good if he instantly believes Iago's word over her. He suddenly seems completely against her and starts to focus on how maybe people had tried to warn him against her, and the reasons that it wouldn't work out. He talks about both his race and age. Othello copes with this seemingly fatal blow by convincing himself that he hates Desdemona and she is a whore: ‘She's gone: I am abused, and my relief Must be to loathe her.' This puts a great deal of pressure on his pride, but to keep feeling good about himself Othello curses her, in a bid to convince himself that he is better off without her and deal with the situation. This actually shows him to have a very weak character despite his heroic image as he has to convince himself she is so terrible just to make himself feel good. In a way even at this point we could say that he is a tragic hero, as he does have some very apparent faults and we can foresee his demise. He has shown strength in body, but not in mind. Once he has been convinced of Desdemona's guilt, Othello believes that everyone is mocking him and laughing at him behind his back: ‘A fixed figure for the time of scorn'. He thinks that he has been made a fool, by Desdemona who he now sees as calculating and deceptive: ‘Patience, though young and rose lipped cherubin, Ay, there look grim as hell!' Here he is reflecting on the transformation that he feels Desdemona has made, from a pure, innocent heavenly creature of beauty to a fierce, evil, cunning whore. This is a contrast between good and evil, with the images of heaven and hell, which we could compare to the themes of good and evil in the play represented by Desdemona and Iago. The language at this time of the play moves very swiftly from positive to negative, as if we can feel the evil Iago has created gradually spreading everywhere. We can also see in the quote language which is very poetic, and a great use of metaphors such as how he refers to Desdemona as a ‘cherubin' as she seemed so good and innocent. This is unusual for Othello as earlier in the play he scorns his own use of poetic language: ‘I prattle out of fashion†¦' (act2scene1) Here he is referring to his speech to Desdemona after their arrival in Cyprus, and is admitting to himself that he is usually a far more plain speaker without fancy language or poetic phrases. This would suggest that either Desdemona brings out a different more romantic side in him, or that he is playing a role in front of her to convince them both that he is a perfect lover as well as soldier. Now by using this poetic style language, which he scorned before, to convey his anger the audience are struck by the feeling that he has been encompassed by some kind of change, and it signifies the success of Iago's plan. The final scene of Othello is constructed in such a way that speeches of dramatic eloquence are entwined with straightforward dialogue. Othello is now completely convinced that he must kill Desdemona, and he tries to justify himself by saying he is doing it for the good of other men. I think another flaw in Othello's character is that his work, fighting as a hero for his people and killing enemies, is so much a part of even his everyday life, that he has become blinded by jealousy and in a kind of madness is suggesting that killing Desdemona has to be done as part of his duty. What really makes him a tragic hero is that he had led himself to believe that what he is about to do is correct, yet he still loves her and so he is confused. Othello talks about what he is going to do as if it is something that has to be done, as if he is putting an animal out of its misery: ‘It is the cause, it is the cause, my soul:' He thinks that he is sacrificing her to an ideal rather than murdering her in vengeful hatred. A lot of emphasis is now placed on her beauty, especially the whiteness of her skin. Othello tells himself that he has to kill Desdemona, yet he does not want to ruin this beauty: ‘Yet I'll not shed her blood, Nor scar that whiter skin of hers than snow.' The whiteness of her skin described makes us think about her purity and innocence, and it is another contrast with colour, light things personifying goodness. This makes us think of the good and evil in the play again. He is trying to avoid marking her body as she is so pretty. Maybe he also does not want to damage her body because he is convinced that he is doing a good thing and helping her, and he doesn't think that it needs to be a violent slaughter just a quiet sacrifice. He no longer thinks about his anger, but just wants to do what he considers has to be done. By believing what he is about to do is the right thing Othello is following the typical ‘fall' of a tragic hero, acting on what he believes to be true and thinking that his actions are correct. Again we think of her purity and goodness when he talks about ‘putting out the light' which personifies her as a light in reference to her life. He also refers to her as a rose, which shows that he is keen to compare her to things that appear to be nice, maybe because we know that he stills appreciates her beauty, or maybe because he see's it as a disguise: ‘When I have plucked the rose, I cannot give it vital growth again.' This is a euphemism for death. From the second line we know that Othello realises what he is about to do is irreversible: the words ‘vital growth' mean that once he has plucked the rose (Desdemona) and taken her life, he cannot give it back again. This may show that he has given the murder some thought, but he certainly has not considered it rationally or thought about the consequences of his actions. It think that the way Othello is now using metaphors to describe everything it proves that he is not thinking clearly and that he is caught up in some kind of obsession, quite apart from reality. By never referring to it directly, it makes us think he is not looking at the whole situation in a sensible or wise way. By kissing Desdemona one last time, Othello shows that he is still drawn to her and loves her, yet he doesn't want to believe it. It builds up a lot of tension for the audience because right until the last moment we are still wondering if he will reconsider and change his mind, as it is obvious there is still love there. He wants to remember her the way she was when he was in love with her, charming and beautiful and not betraying or cheating on him. It is obvious that he values perfection, and he would rather her be dead and beautiful than alive and hurting him and causing trouble. During this part of the play Othello has been so taken over by evil that, as an audience, we start to hate him and feel anger at his violence, jealousy and severe misjudgement of his wife. I think also we can recognise a certain naivety within his character, for trusting someone's word enough to kill the person he cares for most in the world. In the final few minutes of the play when Othello is confronted with the reality of what he has done by the other men, he is full of remorse and can see that he has made a terrible mistake. He tries to remind them of the man of greatness that he once was: ‘I have done the state some service and they know't' Here he is remembering how noble he used to be and he is reminding them of what he has done for them all in his heroic past. Maybe he is also trying to reassure himself that he has been a good person in his life before now, and of the good things that he has achieved. He asks the men there to speak of him how he really is, and to talk about his behaviour the way it was: ‘Speak of me as I am: nothing extenuate, nor set down aught in malice.' He is asking them not to excuse his actions, but not to talk of him brutally either. He wants them to tell the truth as they see or believe it, and to think about his reasons. This shows that he is trying to keep some dignity and that he values honesty in people, which suggests that still he is a good person. He describes himself as a person that does not usually get jealous, but was ‘wrought' with it, and ‘perplexed in the extreme'. Again he uses poetic language to express how he feels: ‘Like the base Indian threw a pearl away'. Here he is using another metaphor, this time to describe how he just threw Desdemona's life away and destroyed her, and how he was unaware of her true value and ignorant about the special person that she was. In the end all tragic heroes come to terms with what they have done, and realise that they have made terrible mistakes and have been acting without reason but on their emotions. Othello then takes the decision to end his own life, as he feels that he has been reduced to nothing and has lost everything he ever worked for. He has completely fallen from grace and meets the stereotyped image of a tragic hero perfectly as he goes from courageous hero to the disgraceful position of a murderer. He talks about himself as two people: ‘Where a malignant and a turbaned Turk, Beat a Venetian and traduced the state' He sees himself as both an honourable soldier and a murderous lover, but he doesn't want to live as what he has been reduced to. He can't live with himself after realising what he has done and the full extent of his actions. He may kill himself because he feels that he deserves it for doing such a think, but I also think that his dignity plays a big part as he wants to retain some of that and his pride. He refers to himself as a ‘Turk' in this passage, which of course his is, but he has always been recognised as part of the Venetian society, and never referred to as that. He is trying to make the point that he is their servant and enemy and will never truly be one of them because of his colour. By this we can tell that he truly has lost all his pride and self assurance, as he never made any statements about this before and always believed in himself and that he could succeed. It has all been the simple emotion of jealousy inside him that has caused the deaths of an innocent woman, a brave and noble man and a passionate love affair. I think that Othello is a true tragic hero because he goes from such a height of greatness to such shame and disgrace. He loses everything. He clearly makes his own decisions, even though he is greatly influenced by Iago. Then at the end of the play he recognises his mistakes and sees his fatal flaw: that he was too trusting of Iago and that jealousy blinded his love, and led him to become what he has. His character has changed – from the beginning of the play, where he is confident, proud and well-respected – to the end when he is remorseful, full of shame and looked down on in disgrace. However he has remained determined all the time to do what he believes, and has always been honest even though people haven't been with him. The play evokes feelings of frustration and sadness: frustration at the ignorance of Othello about the characters around him, and sadness at the cost of his actions, and loss of an innocent life. Othello is completely in the tradition of a literary tragic hero and dies a victim of his own making.